This chapter identifies the distinction between cosmopolitanism and provincialism. It explains that cosmopolitanism is typically associated with elite/popular forces whereas provinciality is subalternity. Cosmopolitanism suggests mobility of discrete bodies that are sufficiently abstracted from the particularities of a location. Their social significance resides in their ability to make connections beyond their immediate context, which is to generate new familiarities. Provinciality is about circumscribed bodies and knowledge, characterized by lack of movement and the inability to connect beyond one’s contextual familiarities. The chapter then associated provincial cosmopolitanism as the ability to resignify one’s labor and body, without the desire or the luxury of decontextualizing oneself.
Minnesota Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.