Elemental Complexity and Relational Vitality: The Relevance of Nomadic Thought for Contemporary Science
Elemental Complexity and Relational Vitality: The Relevance of Nomadic Thought for Contemporary Science
This chapter begins with a discussion of the “knowing” subject as multiplicity, process, and becoming. It proposes an alternative vision of both the thinking subject, of his or her evolution, and of the structure of thinking. It develops this insight in two parallel directions: the first is a sociopolitical critique of the identity politics of the allegedly universal subject of knowledge. The second is a more conceptual critique of the rationalist takes of subjectivity but also of what it means to think at all. The remainder of the chapter discusses the decentering of anthropocentrism, which is one of the effects of the scientific advances of today; the theoretical and methodological implications of the postanthropocentric shift for the practice of science; an anti-Oedipal approach to the question of intergenerational ethics; and the Deleuzian-Nietzschean perspective ethics.
Keywords: Deleuze, knowing, thinking, scientific reason, nomadic subjectivity, knowledge, anthropocentrism, ethics, Nietzsche
Minnesota Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.
