Might the dominance of males be a myth?
This chapter interrogates the commonly held assumption that competitive hierarchies organized around physical dominance—often among males for access to females of a species—stems from experimental conventions that produce the behaviours they were designed to observe. The author cites several counterexamples among primates and wolves and criticizes the theory of dominance for its artificial introduction of scarce resources and stress in captivity.
Minnesota Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.