Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Governing the WildEcotours of Power$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Stephanie Rutherford

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780816674404

Published to Minnesota Scholarship Online: August 2015

DOI: 10.5749/minnesota/9780816674404.001.0001

Show Summary Details

Science and Storytelling: Al Gore and the Climate Debate

Science and Storytelling: Al Gore and the Climate Debate

Chapter:
(p.139) Chapter 4 Science and Storytelling: Al Gore and the Climate Debate
Source:
Governing the Wild
Author(s):

Stephanie Rutherford

Publisher:
University of Minnesota Press
DOI:10.5749/minnesota/9780816674404.003.0004

This chapter focuses on the construction of climate change discourse by examining the personage and work of Al Gore. An Inconvenient Truth relies on the impartiality and unquestioned truth of science to warn of impending global apocalypse, reinscribing the pre-eminence of this way of understanding nonhuman nature. An Inconvenient Truth and the persona of Al Gore offer an ethics of the self, an individualized form of green governmentality. Gore acts as a preeminent truth-teller, and his interweaving of science and storytelling is a potent way to narrate environmental crisis, reshaping the categories to meet the needs of the modern world.

Keywords:   climate change, Al Gore, climate debate, An Inconvenient Truth, global apocalypse, green governmentality, environmental crisis

Minnesota Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.