Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Spinoza Now$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Dimitris Vardoulakis

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780816672806

Published to Minnesota Scholarship Online: August 2015

DOI: 10.5749/minnesota/9780816672806.001.0001

Show Summary Details

Spinoza and the Conflict of Interpretations

Spinoza and the Conflict of Interpretations

Chapter:
(p.3) 1 Spinoza and the Conflict of Interpretations
Source:
Spinoza Now
Author(s):

Christopher Norris

Publisher:
University of Minnesota Press
DOI:10.5749/minnesota/9780816672806.003.0001

This chapter provides an overview of the way Spinoza has been received by various philosophical traditions. It starts by observing the great conflict in the interpretation of Spinoza, namely, that Spinoza has been viewed either as an atheist or as a mystic, either as a materialist or as a spiritualist. Tracing some aspects of this variegated history, the chapter argues that its latest incarnation divides an interpretation of Spinoza between analytic and continental philosophers. Spinoza’s radically monist understanding of body and mind or world and mind offers by far the most effective counterinstance to the whole way of thinking and its hold on philosophers from Descartes down. Thus, his work has very often been taken up by radicals or dissidents.

Keywords:   Spinoza, philosophical traditions, atheist, mystic, materialist, spiritualist, philosophers, Descartes, radicals

Minnesota Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.